PDF Ebook Friendly Introduction to Mathematical Logic, A
Friendly Introduction To Mathematical Logic, A as one of the referred books that we will certainly supply in this web site has been checked out to be one legitimate resource. Also this subject prevails, the way just how writer makes it is really eye-catching. It can attract individuals who have not feels for checking out to begin reading. It will certainly make somebody keen on this book to review. And also it will certainly educate somebody making much better decision.
Friendly Introduction to Mathematical Logic, A
PDF Ebook Friendly Introduction to Mathematical Logic, A
Don't change your mind when you are beginning to plan to have analysis practice. This practice is a great as well as terrific routine. You should enliven it with the very best publications. Many publications reveal and provide there unbelievable material based on each categories and also topics. Also each publication has different preference of composing; they will offer far better condition when read extremely well. This is exactly what makes us happily existing Friendly Introduction To Mathematical Logic, A as one of guides to read now.
Reading is type of need to do everyday. Like exactly what you do your everyday activities, consuming or doing your everyday tasks. And also currently, why should be reading? Checking out, once again, can assist you to find brand-new manner in which will certainly purchase you to life much better. That's not just what you call as the commitment. You could check out Friendly Introduction To Mathematical Logic, A in the spare time as added activities. It will not additionally obligate you to review it for many pages. Simply, by actions and you could see how this publication remarkably.
Starting from seeing this website, you have tried to start loving reviewing a book Friendly Introduction To Mathematical Logic, A This is specialized site that offer hundreds collections of publications Friendly Introduction To Mathematical Logic, A from great deals sources. So, you will not be tired more to select the book. Besides, if you also have no time at all to browse guide Friendly Introduction To Mathematical Logic, A, simply rest when you remain in workplace and open up the web browser. You could locate this Friendly Introduction To Mathematical Logic, A lodge this site by hooking up to the internet.
Nowadays, the innovative modern technology always provides the amazing attributes of just how this publication. Everybody will certainly need to get such specific analysis product, regarding scientific research or fictions; it will depend upon their perception. In some cases, you will certainly require social or scientific research publication to check out. In some cases, you need the fiction or literary works publication to have more enjoyment. It will certainly ensure your condition to get even more inspiration and experience of reading a book.
From the Back Cover
This user-friendly introduction to the key concepts of mathematical logic focuses on concepts that are used by mathematicians in every branch of the subject. Using an assessible, conversational style, it approaches the subject mathematically (with precise statements of theorems and correct proofs), exposing readers to the strength and power of mathematics, as well as its limitations, as they work through challenging and technical results. Structures and Languages. Deductions. Comnpleteness and Compactness. Incompleteness--Groundwork. The Incompleteness Theorems. Set Theory. : For readers in mathematics or related fields who want to learn about the key concepts and main results of mathematical logic that are central to the understanding of mathematics as a whole.
Read more
Product details
Hardcover: 218 pages
Publisher: Prentice Hall; 1st edition (December 8, 1999)
Language: English
ISBN-10: 0130107050
ISBN-13: 978-0130107053
Product Dimensions:
6 x 0.5 x 9 inches
Shipping Weight: 1.3 pounds
Average Customer Review:
4.3 out of 5 stars
5 customer reviews
Amazon Best Sellers Rank:
#1,326,184 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
This may well be the finest introduction to mathematical logic that you have never heard of. The current edition is published in-house at SUNY Geneseo, and has therefore not received the same promotional advantages of books from the larger publishers. This is one reason why I am placing this review on Amazon; in my opinion, this extraordinary book deserves to be widely used . I recommend this book in the strongest possible terms to two groups: (1) mathematics professors searching for a text for the first undergraduate course in mathematical logic, and (2) mathematically mature readers who want to study mathematical logic alone.I have taught mathematical logic to undergraduates many times over the years. As primary course texts, I have used three well-known books: (1) Enderton; (2) Ebbinghaus, Flum and Thomas; and (3) Hodel. I admire each of these books, and class usage has clearly revealed that each has its own distinct strengths.. However, after working through the first six chapters of Leary and Kristiansen’s ([L-K]) book rather carefully, including writing up solutions to all the exercises, I have decided that this will become my primary course text the next time I teach mathematical logic. What follows are some of the characteristics of the book that led me to that decision.1) The User-Friendly Tone of Presentation: Reading this text is somewhat like receiving personal tutoring from your elder sibling who has received a Ph.D. in mathematical logic. In places when it is appropriate, the prose is quite informal, explaining complicated concepts in intuitive terms, providing historical details to help motivate, and helping the student navigate through lengthy passages of rather detailed proofs and constructions with frequent words of explanation and encouragement. The authors’ enthusiasm for the subject is apparent on nearly every page. As [L-K] state in the Preface, their primary goal is to permit students to study the Completeness and Soundness Theorems, The Compactness Theorem, and Godel’s First and Second Incompleteness Theorems in a traditional, one-semester course. Some might believe that this is an impossibly ambitious goal (I did, at first). But after careful study of the book, I am convinced the authors have succeeded. In order to achieve these goals, the authors have devoted less space than other books do to certain foundational topics (even the customary first chapter on propositional logic is missing). After years of experience, I now agree with the wisdom (and necessity) of this decision; other instructors may disagree, of course. My goals in a first mathematical logic course have evolved over the years to exposing the students to a few of the most compelling results so that, just perhaps, they will be motivated to continue their study of logic long after the course ends. Will students be experts at using the many versions of the General Recursion Theorem after reading this book? Certainly not. But they will be well prepared to continue their studies in a graduate text such as HInman or Bell and Machover, where these topics will be fully developed and, perhaps, more fully appreciated.2) The Clarity of the Writing: The first author states in the Preface, “One of the tasks that I set for myself as I wrote this book was to be mindful of the audience.†The result is a book that a motivated undergraduate mathematics major could use for independent study (a rarity in this difficult subject). The perfect example to illustrate the point is the proof of the Completeness Theorem, which begins on page 74 and doesn’t conclude until page 86. As many authors do, [L-K] present Leon Henkin’s beautiful proof of this result. However, their presentation is quite unique. A global outline of the proof is presented first to help the student fix in his mind the path of the entire journey. The proof is then presented in small, incremental steps, with each step explained in clear terms before the formal mathematics occurs. One can actually read all twelve pages of this proof in one sitting, follow and understand both the details and the IDEA of the proof, and not feel overwhelmed by the effort. This is a masterful presentation. In his popular book on the Theory of Computation, Michael Sipser introduced the “Idea of Proof†passages that precede actual proofs. Leary and Kristiansen take this innovative idea to another level entirely, inserting clear discussions of the ideas within each stage of the formal proofs, just at the points where they are most needed.The book also contains 54 indented passages, labeled “Chaffâ€, which are meant to clarify, amplify, foreshadow, and/or explain especially difficult points. The authors state that, like chaff, these passages could blow away in the wind and all the requisite mathematical details would still be there; however, I predict with confidence that students will find the Chaff sections the most helpful and informative passages in the text. As I read many of these passages, I found myself thinking, “That is exactly what I would have said in my lecture to help clarify the point.â€3) The Exercises: It is apparent that serious thought (and some restraint) went into the selection of the exercises, which are integrated perfectly within the text. The first seven chapters contain a total of 234 exercises, with an average of six questions per set. The serious student therefore could, and should, attempt all of them without undue stress. In many sections, selected exercises complete missing steps within a proof in the text, thus inspiring a careful reading of the proof. The level of difficulty is adequate to challenge students without overwhelming them. Answers to many (not all) of the exercises are provided in the back of the book; this will be extremely helpful to those who study alone.The addition of the second author for the second edition resulted in the inclusion of much new material on the theory of computation. Accordingly, the text has been organized so that instructors can choose either one of two approaches to Godel’s First Incompleteness Theorem without loss of continuity.Prospective readers always want to know about prerequisites. In my judgment, this book is accessible to any student of mathematics who has had (1) a transition course introducing proofs and propositional logic, followed by (2) at least one solid, proof-based course in linear algebra, abstract algebra, or elementary analysis. It is more an issue of maturity than specific material prerequisites. However, many of the structures that are studied are drawn from abstract algebra.Not all mathematicians study logic and foundations as part of their education, so the target audience for any such text is relatively small. SUNY-Geneseo should be commended for making this exceptional textbook available to those who want to study the foundations of mathematics.
This book was a great way to learn about Math Logic. I do admit that I had some experience coming from a Discrete Math & Theory of Computation background, but this book was extremely accessible. None of this garbage like "A proof is a 7 tuple consisting of ..." that makes no sense. The authors are very witty, and they make the material easy to learn. Not to say that it isn't hard - there are some sections that you may have to read a few times to understand, but the material is all there :)
Not all that friendly. It has a fault of using the exercises in the text and no answers for them.
The impossible goal of this text is to start from scratch and then cover both incompleteness theorems in a single semester, and under his presentation it would almost be manageable. This is by far the best written text on predicate calculus I have read. Kaye and Goldrei can't really compare, as they contain less material and what they do cover isn't done quite as well. Enderton on the other hand covers more than Leary, but is much more dense and would not serve as well as an introduction.The main drawback of the book is how much effort the author put into making it fit into a single semester. There is a lot of fascinating material that could have been covered in greater depth than is done. It is worth noting that he almost completely skips over propositional calculus, so if you find yourself struggling at the beginning of the book you may want to read up on that subject in another text (the first half of Goldrei would do nicely). Also the section on the second incompleteness theorem is extremely rushed; some of the properties of peano arithmetic used for the proof are not proven.Still, it's better than the other options I've seen. You would think with all the mediocre mathematics texts Dover picks up they would have found this gem.Beyond knowing the rudiments of naïve set theory, prerequisites should not be much of a concern.
I have used this text in both graduate and undergraduate courses as well as tutorials and independent studies. It is the best text for a one semester course that introduces formal logic and has as its goal the Incompleteness Theorems of Godel. Students have reported it to be very readable and the array of exercises is excellent. Moreover, the author is a really nice fellow.
Friendly Introduction to Mathematical Logic, A PDF
Friendly Introduction to Mathematical Logic, A EPub
Friendly Introduction to Mathematical Logic, A Doc
Friendly Introduction to Mathematical Logic, A iBooks
Friendly Introduction to Mathematical Logic, A rtf
Friendly Introduction to Mathematical Logic, A Mobipocket
Friendly Introduction to Mathematical Logic, A Kindle
